Archive
- Only life and health insurance pricing is on the AI Act's high-risk list
- Fine-tuning an AI model for your web shop rarely makes you a model provider
- Read the manual: Article 13 instructions for use are a lender's first AI Act tool
- Is your shop software even 'AI'? Check the definition first
- Building your own AI model? Bank governance covers most of the AI Act quality system, but not three parts
- Face matching in your stores is not banned by the AI Act, but it is high-risk
- When your bank becomes the AI Act provider
- AI that rates warehouse staff is high-risk, and workers must be told first
- Article 4 AI literacy is already live — support staff skills, don’t certify every person
- "Not high-risk" is a claim you have to prove, and profiling always counts
- Article 86 — customers can demand an explanation of AI-backed credit decisions
- Your AI may not read your staff's emotions
- Your financial supervisor is likely your AI Act watchdog
- Credit scoring and insurance pricing AI need a rights assessment before first use
- When personalisation becomes prohibited: the AI Act's ban on manipulation and exploiting vulnerabilities
- Make GPAI model documentation a go-live gate, not a follow-up email
- AI-looking product images and video need a clear deployer disclosure
- Article 99's fine ladder is already live for financial institutions
- Digital Omnibus didn't pause the EU AI Act
- Financial-services rules can cover AI Act monitoring
- High-risk AI needs real human oversight
- Social scoring of customers is banned
- AI chatbots must say they are AI from the first message
- Credit scoring is high-risk AI